Liturgical Introduction

collectarium_01 recto.jpg

1 r. The book opens with the start of the liturgical year (First Sunday in Advent). Dominica prima de adventu

 

What is a “collectar”?

by Drew Jones, Department of English, The Ohio State University

 

The leaves 1r-30v of the manuscript are the collectar portion of this manuscript. To understand what a collectar was and how it was used, you will need to know just a few basic points about medieval liturgy. (If you wish to know more than what’s said here, suggestions for further reading follow at the end of this document.)

(1) By “liturgy” is usually meant formal, communal worship, typically involving ritualized combinations of words, singing, gestures etc.  For convenience, it is normal to distinguish “liturgy” from “devotion,” the former being essentially public, the latter private.  In fact, that distinction is not very helpful when it comes to dealing with medieval manuscripts; that is to say, many “liturgical” manuscripts contain “devotional” material, whereas many medieval “devotions” became ritualized, public practices hard to distinguish from “liturgy” proper.  Moreover, the same set of source-texts—above all, the Psalms—served as the essential ingredient for both liturgical and devotional observances.

(2) All liturgy of the medieval church was organized into an annual cycle (“the liturgical calendar”).  Somewhat confusingly (to us, at least), this calendar combined two different reckonings of time. One set of holy days fell on fixed dates, the same every year—thus for example Christmas (25 December), Epiphany (6 January), and all the many feast-days for individual saints. Another set of holy days, however, including some of the most important liturgical celebrations of the Christian year, depended on the date of Easter, which changed from year to the next.  So, the liturgical calendar consisted of two interlocked cycles of fixed and movable feasts.

Here you encounter examples of both these reckonings of liturgical time. The liturgical year begins not at New Year’s day, but rather with the first Sunday in Advent (Dominica prima in aduentu domini; Advent is the season of four weeks leading up to Christmas).

Notice that the manuscript opens with texts for the four Sundays of the Advent season (folios 1r-1v), i.e. the season leading up to Christmas. (While the date of Christmas is fixed, the dates of the individual Sundays in Advent cannot be.) After Christmas, the next major feasts are also on fixed dates: 1 January is the Feast of the Circumcision of Jesus (see folio 2 verso) and 6 January the Feast of Epiphany (folios 2 verso – 3 recto). On folio 4 recto, however, begin the so-called pre-Lenten seasons (Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima), as well as Lent itself (from folio 4 recto on), all dependent on the variable date of Easter. (Pre-Lent and Lent were seasons of penance and fasting in preparation for the Easter season.)

collectarium 2r detail.jpg

2r. l.1-2: Rubric introducing prayers for Christmas Eve at Terce. in vigilia nativitatus domini. Ad tertiam.







You will encounter on these folios two other technical terms related to the dates for various feasts.  These are (i) “in vigilia” (on the vigil [of]; thus folios. 2r2; 2v6; 2v18; 3r6-7), which simply refers to the evening prior to and anticipatory of an important day in the church calendar; and (ii) “infra octauas” (through the “octave” of, i.e. through the week [8 days inclusive] following; thus folios 3r19 ff; 3v1-2 and 10-11); this term refers to the practice whereby elements of liturgies on the holiest days of the church calendar—such as Christmas, Epiphany, Easter, and Pentecost—would be repeated daily for the full week after those feasts.

collectarium 3r detail.jpg

3r. l. 19: Rubric introducing the prayers for the octave of Epiphany. Dominica infra octauas epyphanie capitulum



 

 

(3) By the end of late antiquity (i.e., the 5th/6th centuries C.E.), there is evidence that Christian liturgies in both the East and West involved two fundamental components.

 

(a) the liturgy of the Eucharist (called “the Mass” in the Latin West), i.e. a commemoration of Jesus’s Last Supper with the disciples;

 

(b) the “liturgy of the hours” (also called the “Divine Office” or simply “the Office”), i.e. a series of seven (or eight) prayer-services distributed regularly through the course of every day and night.   These services consisted mainly of singing the Psalms, reading passages from Old and New Testaments, and reciting certain prayers.

      We call these individual services of the Western Divine Office by names adapted from their Latin ones:

 

the “day hours”:

            Lauds (Latin laudes, or matutinae) before daybreak

            Prime (Latin prima (hora)) “the first hour,” i.e. 6am*

            Terce (Latin tertia (hora)) “the third hour,” i.e. 9am*

            Sext (Latin sexta (hora)) “the “sixth hour,” i.e. 12 noon*

            None (Latin nona (hora)) “the “ninth hour,” i.e. 3pm*

 

the “night hours”

            Vespers (Latin vespera(e)) evening

            Compline (Latin ad completumcompletorium) before bed)

Nocturns (Latin nocturnale officium, or vigiliae) starting as early as 2am, depending of time of year

 

* these times “6am”are only very approximate; the medieval day and night were divided into 12 hours each (like our own),but their “hour” differed from ours in that it had no absolute duration but rather lengthened or shortened depending on the time of year.  In winter, for example, when northern European nights are very long, one “hour” would have been longer than 60 of our minutes; conversely, in summer, one nighttime “hour” could be less than 60 of our minutes.

 

Such is the daily round (or horarium) of the Divine Office in its simplest form.  In actuality, both the organization and terminology of the Office liturgy in medieval manuscripts are often more complicated, owing to the fact that this daily schedule tended to become crowded with extra devotional obligations as well as a daily celebration of one or often two Masses.

 

(4) Medieval manuscripts for the liturgy tend to keep the components for the Mass separate from those for the Divine Office.  By the twelfth century, moreover, it was increasingly common for all the various readings and chants for the Mass to be gathered into a single book called the “missal,” while the readings and chants relevant to the Divine Office might be gathered into a single (often multi-volume) work called the “breviary.”

 

Despite the tendency to group the texts in those ways, some monastic and clerical communities retained a more old-fashioned division of the various texts and chants for the Divine Office among several different books—each book containing only the material needed by one particular participant in the Office.  Thus the “lectionary” would contain the biblical readings to be recited by the lector (reader); the “antiphoner” would contain the music and text of chants to be led by the precentor (choir-master); and so on.  Another such specific book was the “collectar,” containing two short items that the presider at the Divine Office would have been responsible for reciting.  These two items are known as:

 

(i) the “chapter”—Latin capitulum (singular), capitula (plural)—was a short reading  from scripture recited by the person presiding at the various hours of the Divine Office.  (At Nocturns, however, where the biblical and other readings were much longer, they tended to be included in a different book.) 

 

(ii) the “collect”—Latin collecta (singular), collectae (plural)—was a short prayer, usually summing up the major theme(s) of a particular liturgical day or season.  The collects so used in the Offices were often the same as those used in the liturgy of the Mass (where a collect occurs near the beginning of that service).

 

These two types of items—chapters and collects—are what fill the manuscript leaves 1r-30v, and their presence is what identifies this part of the book as a “collectar.”

 

You may note, in addition, that the collectar is in two successive parts, each following the liturgical calendar from Advent to the 25th Sunday after Pentecost:

 

 

collectarium_04 verso_05 recto.jpg

4v-5r from the Temporale. Prayers for the four Sundays of Lent.

The Temporale

 

(1r-15r), also called the Proper of Time, provided the texts for the days commemorating the major events in Christ's life.

collectarium_17r.jpg

17r from the Sanctorale. Prayers for the feast days of Saints Fabian & Sebastian, martyrs (l. 3) and for Saint Agnes, virgin and martyr (l. 15)

The Sanctorale


(15r-30v), also known as the Proper of Saints, was used for the celebration of saints’ days throughout the liturgical year. Here, as in many cases, the sanctorale begins with the celebration of St. Stephen on 26 December and ended with St. Thomas the Apostle on 21 December. While the more important saints were present in all sanctorale, minor saints varied from manuscript to manuscript. These differences can help decipher the manuscript’s origin and provenance.

 

Suggestions for further reading

Introductions to medieval liturgy:

John Harper, The Forms and Orders of Western Liturgy from the Tenth to the Eighteenth Century: A Historical Introduction and Guide for Students and Musicians (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)

Éric Palazzo, A History of Liturgical Books from the Beginning to the Thirteenth Century, translated by Madeleine Beaumont (Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 1998 [orig. published in French, 1993]

Thomas J. Heffernan and E. Ann Matter, eds., The Liturgy of the Medieval Church, 2nd edition (Kalamazoo, Mich.: Medieval Institute Publications, 2005)



Studies of medieval collectars—their evolution and typical forms:

Alicia Corrêa, ed., The Durham Collectar, Publications of the Henry Bradshaw Society 107 (London: Boydell, for the Henry Bradshaw Society, 1992), pp. 3-21

Pierre-Marie Gy, "Collectaire, rituel, processionnal,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 44 (1960), 441-69; revised and reprinted in his La liturgie dans l’histoire (Paris: Éditions saint-Paul and Éditions du Cerf, 1990), pp. 91-126 at 92-108

--------------------
Commentary by Drew Jones, Department of English, The Ohio State University, December 2010 (except for the paragraph on the Sanctorale, adapted from Clemens and Graham, Introduction to Manuscript Studies, Cornell U.P. 2007)